Skip to main content
Use case · AI tools, custom

Generic chatbots are noise. We tune the signal.

Custom AI assistants on your data. Trained on your voice, your docs, your customers. Routing, triage, drafted replies, internal Q&A — built where the work actually happens, not bolted on a sidebar.

Triage accuracy
Reply draft quality
Internal Q&A latency
Hallucination rate
Custom-trained Your voice · your docs · your data2m → 30s Typical reply time, typicalSource-cited No-source no-answer rule100% Owned, exportable model layer
What's in the build

Six pieces, one assistant.

Not a chatbot in a sidebar. A purpose-built tool that does one or two things very well — triage, drafting, internal Q&A — on top of your data, in your voice.

01 · Data layer

Your docs, indexed properly.

Customer history, SOPs, product catalogue, past replies — indexed with retrieval-augmented generation. The model only answers from sources you control.

  • RAG over your own data
  • Source-citation enforced
  • Per-section permissions
  • Drift & recency monitoring
02 · Voice tuning

Reads like you, not like a robot.

Trained on your past replies, your tone, your house style. Suggested drafts feel like you wrote them — because they're written from how you write.

  • Past-reply training corpus
  • Per-channel tone (WA vs email)
  • House-style enforcement
  • Owner-reviewed before send
03 · Triage

The right person, automatically.

Inbound enquiries classified by type, urgency, customer history. Routes to the right owner with a draft reply pre-loaded. Reply time falls without quality dropping.

  • Auto-classification
  • Skill & urgency routing
  • Pre-loaded reply drafts
  • Confidence-score gating
04 · Internal Q&A

Staff ask, answer cited.

Internal assistant that answers staff questions from your SOPs and policies. Cites the source document. New starters productive on day one without owner intervention.

  • Slack · Teams · web app
  • Source-document citations
  • Per-role answer scoping
  • Unanswered-query log
05 · Guardrails

It says "I don't know" on purpose.

Hard guardrails: cites sources or says it can't answer. No hallucinated procedures. Confidence thresholds tuned to your tolerance. Owner reviews flagged outputs.

  • No-source no-answer rule
  • Confidence thresholds
  • Owner-review queue
  • Audit log of every answer
06 · Owner panel

What it answered, what it deflected.

Daily summary: queries handled, escalated, deflected. Where the model is confident, where it isn't. The assistant earns trust by being measurable.

  • Volume & deflection rate
  • Confidence distribution
  • Top unanswered queries
  • Per-channel quality scores
Method

Read · Find · Write.

Two weeks reading the actual work — past replies, SOP coverage, the questions staff already ask — before we tune a model. The build follows the manual triage you're sick of doing.

  1. 01

    Read

    Two weeks reviewing past customer threads, SOP gaps, and the repeat questions staff already ask. The model starts with how you already work, not with a generic prompt.

  2. 02

    Find

    One use case gets prioritised — usually triage or internal Q&A. We define guardrails, success metrics, and the smallest scope that proves it works.

  3. 03

    Write

    We index, tune, instrument. Ninety days of stabilisation while it earns trust on real traffic. Owner review queue, audit log, exportable model layer. Owned by you.

Sample engagement

The independent garage that turned three SOP binders into one assistant.

Four bays. Six technicians. Three ring-binders of MOT and warranty SOPs nobody reads.

An independent garage owned eighteen years of accumulated SOPs — MOT pre-checks, warranty paperwork, customer-courtesy-car policy — across paper binders, an old Wiki, and the head technician's memory. Three-week build: ingestion of every doc into an AI assistant on the workshop tablet, source-cited answers (no hallucination — every reply links to the SOP page), confidence-gated auto-send for status updates to customers. Technicians stopped interrupting each other to ask "is this an MOT-fail item?"; the head tech got back two hours a day.

How we measure: 614 questions logged in the assistant over 90 days; technician interruption events sampled by floor observation, weeks 1, 4, and 12; baseline taken from the prior month's WhatsApp group history.

2 hrs / dayhead-tech time recovered
−72%technician interruptions
0%hallucination — every reply source-cited
Other use cases

Five more builds, same method.

Each one a tightly-scoped fix for a row that's bleeding on the P&L.

Build the assistant.

One call. No deck. We come prepared.

Send the brief